21 Nov 2014

Lymington Times


































The exchange of views  continues.



1 comment:

rcannard said...

Bill could you substitute this reply for the one i posted earlier,thanks...

If we all just assumed them where would we be, you have to fight for what you want in this world, and if you haven't worked that one out then you will be for ever wanting...
Overwhelming evidence in favour which sounds very one sided and bias when there are thousands of research papers out there that proves the opposite tells me that little or no research has been done by this gentleman,if it had then he would of realised that chlorine is a part of the water treatment process, where as adding fluoride is not,hence the claim by health authorities "the addition of fluoride is to reduce tooth decay" key word here is "addition" meaning to add after the water cleaning process,which makes it a medication...
So not only does this gentleman want fluoride in the water he wants it in soft drinks,as we no once fluoride is added to the water it will be in our food and everything that fluoridated water comes into contact with including bathing in it...
Now we are entering the dangerous world of over fluoridating as the dose for each individual cannot be regulated...The gentleman goes on to mention the governments launch of nutritional education campaign and thinks we are going to fight this with the same vigour as we did for fluoride,i can only ask why he thinks this when a little research would show that fluoride is not a nutrient and not essential to human life,remember that we are not talking about natural fluoride (calcium fluoride)...
Can i suggest that the next time this gentleman decides to come out of the woodwork to have a rant that he does some research...