If he did read the Echo as he says most of these questions have already been answered.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Chairman
John Spottiswoode BSc, BA, PMP, SNHS (Nut.; Ad. Nut.; Herb.; Anatomy & Physiology)
Links
- IRELAND AGAINST FLUORIDATION
- Video of Prof Connett and SCSHA's decision to fluoridate Southampton.
- UK Against Fluoride
- West Midlands Against Fluoridation
- UK Councils Against Fluoridation
- All Party Parliamentary Group Against Fluoridation
- Fluoride Alert
- South West Hants Green Party
- National Pure Water Association
Newsletter
If you would like to subscribe just e-mail nofluoride@googlemail for latest information on how to stop this undemocratic decision to fluoridate Southampton against the will of the people by 12 unelected members of the Strategic Health Authority who do not even live here.
The Board
Dr Geoffrey Harris - Chairman
Jim Easton - Chief Executive
Chris Evennett – Director of Strategy and Reform Katherine Fenton - Director of Clinical Standards
Olga Senior - Director of Communications & Corporate Affairs
Ben Lloyd - Director of Finance and Investment
Prof. John Newton Regional Director of Public Health
Terry Butler CBE
Alyson Coates .
Joe McLoone
Chris Le Fevre
Martin Howell
The Board
Dr Geoffrey Harris - Chairman
Jim Easton - Chief Executive
Chris Evennett – Director of Strategy and Reform Katherine Fenton - Director of Clinical Standards
Olga Senior - Director of Communications & Corporate Affairs
Ben Lloyd - Director of Finance and Investment
Prof. John Newton Regional Director of Public Health
Terry Butler CBE
Alyson Coates .
Joe McLoone
Chris Le Fevre
Martin Howell
2 comments:
1)It would seem that most city's or towns has poor dental health but we are talking about a small majority who would benefit more from free toothbrushes toothpaste and education.
2)of course especially when you cherry pick the information to suit fluoridation just like the (PHE's) recent report
3)Now that depends which scientist you ask...Looking at (PHE's) report it's extremely one sided so i wouldn't ask any of them
4)Absolutely not we are talking about adding an industrial waste to the drinking water...Any sane person wouldn't even entertain the i dear.
5)The (PHE) wouldn't disclose the amount of money spent to date why? until we know this how are we supposed to no if it's low cost...Bearing in mind that only about 1-2% will actually be drunk, it speaks for itself
6)Like we have a say, but as you asking it should go where it's needed.
7)Guardian poll 63% no...37 yes...Southampton 72% no...next question.
8)Wouldn't they be in trouble if it wasn't..Who no's have you tried reading the waffle issued by government...The water act is a good place to start.
9)How can you use the word satisfied, which cave have you been living in...We are angered at the waste of money and the continuation of.
10)I remember doctors appearing in cigarette ads and asbestos being safe so just because an organization is behind something doesn't mean it's safe...
Personally i doubt very much you read the Echo or have even been following the debate, which is evident in your approach by being clueless and insulting...
The report from the PHE is trash science with cherry picked information, not to mention it's totally one sided...
The questions appear to be formulated by Public Health England.
I hope the councilor isn't the enemy within.
Post a Comment