5 Apr 2010

UK - Those responsible should be before a court of law

Those responsible should be before a court of law
Southampton City Council has demolished the last shred of support for fluoridation by voting for a referendum.
SHA Board members cower behind closed doors, unable to defend an unethical policy reliant on biased propaganda and corrupt science. David C Kennedy, DDS. Professor and past president, International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology: "During the Fountain Congressional hearings of 1977, the NCI admitted that they had relied upon no scientific data whatsoever when they claimed 25 years earlier that fluoride would be safe to add to the community water supplies."
To this day, no evidence exists that proves fluoride at 1ppm is safe. On the contrary, the evidence of harm is overwhelming. All of which begs the question. Why fluoridate the entire public water supply at huge expense to the NHS and the taxpayer, when providing school dentists would give real, risk-free benefit at much lower cost?
The SHA's refusal to answer is as suspicious as their determination to squander nearly half a million pounds on a judicial review, instead of on front line services. Whispers of undue influence abound. Are industry lobbyists involved? The industrial waste product Hexafluorosilicic Acid (used in fluoridation) is a Class 2 poison with no medicinal licence. Industry cannot dispose of it in the sea or in but can make money disposing of it in the public water supply Since fluoride causes the serious condition dental fluorosis, we may assume that the fluoridation roll-out is not for the benefit of teeth, but for the benefit of industry Compulsory mass medication with a dangerous toxin is one of the most sinister policies any government could ever force on the people. Fluoridation is an authoritarian abuse devoid of logic and bereft of social benefit.
The call for legal action against Board members is getting louder by the day This abuse will not stop until those individuals responsible answer for their actions in a court of law.
JENNIFER GODSCHALL JOHNSON,
Upper Clatford.

No comments: