Fluoridation issue: The SHA's silence is deafening
CONGRATULATIONS to JG Johnson for articulating what I have long suspected regarding the real reason for fluoridation i.e. industrial waste disposal under the guise of being a beneficial aid to healthier teeth. It was only recently that I learned that the industrial waste Hexafluosilic Acid cannot be legally disposed of in rivers or the sea and everything has now clicked into place.
In my home town as long ago as the 50s, fluoridation was proposed and thanks to vigorous opposition rejected and still the same cynical battle is being fought -1 now realise why
The case against fluoridation is well known and clearly stated but the SHA's silence is deafening. How on earth do they justify their stance but then again undue influences are perhaps being asserted? I live in hope that the public will make it clear to the SHA what it can do with its fluoridation in no uncertain terms.
M DARNELL, Southampton.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The hot-off-the-press party manifesto enabling local people to set up their own group in the place of under-performing quangos is surely tailor-made for the South Central SHA? Dump these unelected charlatans under whatever means possible.
Post a Comment