tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214184469431175308.post42644126736126992..comments2024-01-21T11:20:56.809+00:00Comments on Hampshire Against fluoridation: Asked by Earl Baldwin of BewdleyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214184469431175308.post-87836241933140507892011-09-16T14:34:42.461+01:002011-09-16T14:34:42.461+01:00Whilst Earl Howe and the MHRA may hold the politic...Whilst Earl Howe and the MHRA may hold the politically convenient belief that fluoridated water is not a medicine, they might like to consider the superior authority of Lord Jauncey, who in 1983 ruled emphatically that it is. As for the supposed 'benefits' justifying any breach of human rights legislation, such arrogance is the hallmark of fascism, and has no place in Parliament. Is Earl Howe prepared to disclose the legal authority on which he bases his decision to abolish the Human Rights legislation - he may like to recall that the HR Act makes it quite clear that, once a right is established, it may not be taken away!Doug Crosshttp://www.ukcaf.orgnoreply@blogger.com